<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Art of Irreverence &#187; walter sorrells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofirreverence.com/tag/walter-sorrells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofirreverence.com</link>
	<description>a family album of books, music, outings, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fiction review: Erratum</title>
		<link>http://artofirreverence.com/2009/03/30/erratum/</link>
		<comments>http://artofirreverence.com/2009/03/30/erratum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Graves</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Review Channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erratum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walter sorrells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofirreverence.com/weblog/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gripping, suspenseful novel, based loosely on string theory, with a surreal and chaotic Neverending Story feel.
Walter Sorrells.&#160; Erratum.&#160; Dutton Children&#8217;s Books, 2008.&#160; 298 pages.&#160; Age 10 to 14.
Metafiction makes me swoon.&#160; When I found Erratum pulling a self-reference in the first chapter, I knew I was going to love it.&#160; Well, 88% chance, anyway.&#160; Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gripping, suspenseful novel, based loosely on string theory, with a surreal and chaotic </i>Neverending Story<i> feel.</i></p>
<p>Walter Sorrells.&nbsp; <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=7q_QPQAACAAJ"><i>Erratum</i></a>.&nbsp; Dutton Children&rsquo;s Books, 2008.&nbsp; 298 pages.&nbsp; Age 10 to 14.</p>
<p>Metafiction makes me swoon.&nbsp; When I found <i>Erratum</i> pulling a self-reference in the first chapter, I knew I was going to love it.&nbsp; Well, 88% chance, anyway.&nbsp; Here&rsquo;s what happens:&nbsp; under strange circumstances, Jessica comes into possession of a painfully-detailed book written about her life, except it keeps changing in length and content, per butterfly she either steps on or doesn&rsquo;t.&nbsp; (Metaphorically.&nbsp; There are no actual butterflies in the book.)&nbsp; None of this ever makes sense, but is it not a testament to the quality of a book when the premise is completely ridiculous and you just don&rsquo;t care?</p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=7q_QPQAACAAJ"><img class="cover" src="http://artofirreverence.com/imgs/books/fiction/s/sorrells_erratum.png" alt="Erratum" /></a></p>
<p>Books are machines.&nbsp; Make sense of that.&nbsp; They clearly aren&rsquo;t made of &ldquo;gears and crankshafts and duct tape and stuff&rdquo; as Jessica&rsquo;s friend Dale suggests machines should be; but according to Lingual Engineer Elwig P. Craven III, who was once hospitalized upon suffering a blow to the head by the word <i>octagonal</i>, it&rsquo;s all about string theory, and its 29 dimensions, and inter-universal, um, connections? <sup><a name="erratum-f1a" href="#erratum-f1b">[1]</a></sup>&nbsp; Jessica isn&rsquo;t buying it.&nbsp; &ldquo;It was obvious the man was one of these grown-ups who thought it was hilarious to say dumb things to kids.&rdquo;&nbsp; And, really, who is this Dr. Craven but a quirky linguist?</p>
<p>The questions keep coming, and the answers are few.&nbsp; Why is the error-laden copy of Jessica&rsquo;s book, <i>Her Lif</i>, more valuable than its reprints?&nbsp; How has everyone but she read a copy of it?&nbsp; What was the continually-referenced battle of Bluntwick, and why is it significant?&nbsp; Somewhere in all this, we learn that Jessica is the protector of our universe, but what does that mean?&nbsp; The novel is purposefully disjointed, and many may find the resolution (if you want to call it that) unsatisfactory.&nbsp; We&rsquo;re talking textbook anticlimactic.</p>
<p>It&rsquo;s a must.&nbsp; If I haven&rsquo;t sold it yet, I leave you with a (hopefully not copyright-infringmentally long) passage that, if you are meant to read this book, should prove irresistible:</p>
<blockquote><div>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Absurdly dangerous abandoned rock quarry!!!<br />DO NOT ENTER!!!!!!!<br />This means you, you complete moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</b></p>
<p>&ldquo;Whoever wrote that, they sure like exclamation points,&rdquo; the tiny person said.</p>
<p>Elwig Craven made no comment.&nbsp; Elwig Craven had, in fact, written it himself.&nbsp; And it was true, he did like exclamation points.&nbsp; In fact, he liked all forms of punctuation&mdash;though the dash&mdash;because of its sinuous versitality&mdash;was&mdash;surely!!!!!&mdash;his favorite.&nbsp; After a minute, they broke out of the woods, arriving at the top of a large cliff.</p>
<p>[ . . . ]</p>
<p>The tiny old person looked down at the water.&nbsp; &ldquo;There&rsquo;s no time like the present,&rdquo; he said.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Strictly speaking,&rdquo; Elwig Craven said, &ldquo;that is false!!!!!!!!!!&nbsp; String theory&mdash;in fact&mdash;tells us that there are an infinite number of times which are&mdash;in many respects&mdash;identical to the present.&rdquo;&nbsp; In his mind, Elwig Craven saw all the dashes and exclamation points in the sentences and savored each one of them.&nbsp; Elwig Craven felt about punctuation the way some people feel about ice cream or chocolate or French wine.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Oh, shut up, Wiggy,&rdquo; the tiny person said.&nbsp; &ldquo;Just do it.&rdquo;</p>
<p>&ldquo;Right, then,&rdquo; Elwig Craven said.</p>
<p>And with that he threw the tiny person off the cliff. (p. 61-62)</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><sup><a name="erratum-f1b" href="#erratum-f1a">[1]</a></sup> I couldn&rsquo;t crack the significance of the number 29.&nbsp; It&rsquo;s a prime number, but other than that&#8230;&nbsp; I know, I know, I should just accept it as arbitrary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://artofirreverence.com/2009/03/30/erratum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
